Nathalie LOISEAU

Nathalie LOISEAU

Partito: Horizons (France)
Gruppo politico: Renew Europe Group

Statistiche di voto

1859
A favore
2447
Contro
61
Astenuto
88
Giustificato
270
Assente
Ha votato in 4725 / 5887 votazioni (80.3%)

Cronologia delle votazioni(4725)

DataVotazioneScelta
2026-03-12A10-0015/2026 – Bogdan Rzońca – § 14 – Am 24Contro
2026-03-12RC-B10-0159/2026 – Motion for a resolutionA favore
2026-03-12A10-0015/2026 – Bogdan Rzońca – Recital B – Am 22Contro
2026-03-12A10-0015/2026 – Bogdan Rzońca – § 16 – Am 37Contro
2026-03-12A10-0015/2026 – Bogdan Rzońca – Recital AC – Am 27Contro
2026-03-12A10-0015/2026 – Bogdan Rzońca – After § 17 – Am 39Contro
2026-03-12RC-B10-0157/2026 – After § 2 – Am 1Contro
2026-03-12B10-0155/2026 – After § 12 – Am 1Contro
2026-03-12A10-0015/2026 – Bogdan Rzońca – § 12 – Am 15D= 36D=A favore
2026-03-12RC-B10-0158/2026 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)A favore
2026-03-12C10-0351/2025 – Commission proposalA favore
2026-03-12A10-0015/2026 – Bogdan Rzońca – § 12/2Contro
2026-03-12A10-0015/2026 – Bogdan Rzońca – § 12/3Contro
2026-03-12C10-0351/2025 – Proposal for rejection – Am 6Contro
2026-03-12A10-0015/2026 – Bogdan Rzońca – § 13 – Am 31Contro
2026-03-12A10-0015/2026 – Bogdan Rzońca – § 19 – Am 40/2Contro
2026-03-12A10-0015/2026 – Bogdan Rzońca – § 19 – Am 40/1Contro
2026-03-12RC-B10-0158/2026 – After § 3 – Am 2A favore
2026-03-12RC-B10-0158/2026 – After § 2 – Am 1A favore
2026-03-12A10-0015/2026 – Bogdan Rzońca – § 17Contro
2026-03-12RC-B10-0157/2026 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)A favore
2026-03-12C10-0351/2025 – Article 1, after § 1 – Am 3Contro
2026-03-12RC-B10-0157/2026 – After recital A – Am 2Contro
2026-03-12A10-0015/2026 – Bogdan Rzońca – § 16 – Am 17Contro
2026-03-12A10-0015/2026 – Bogdan Rzońca – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)Contro
2026-03-12A10-0015/2026 – Bogdan Rzońca – § 17 – Am 18Contro
2026-03-12A10-0015/2026 – Bogdan Rzońca – § 17 – Am 38Contro
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 37 – Am 42Contro
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 41 – Am 48Contro
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 43 – Am 49Contro
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 4 – Am 99Contro
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – Before § 1 – Am 63Contro
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 29/1A favore
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 21 – Am 59/2Contro
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 48/1A favore
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 48/9A favore
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 52 – Am 53Contro
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 21/2A favore
2026-03-10B10-0156/2026 – § 8 – Am 3Contro
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 29 – Am 36Contro
2026-03-10A10-0045/2025 – Abir Al-Sahlani – Proposal to vote on amendmentsContro
2026-03-10A10-0045/2025 – Abir Al-Sahlani – Provisional agreement – Am 163A favore
2026-03-10A10-0011/2026 – Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová – After § 12 – Am 7Contro
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 20 – Am 58/1Contro
2026-03-10A10-0221/2025 – David McAllister, Charles Goerens – Provisional agreement – Am 18A favore
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – recital O/1A favore
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 4 – Am 15Contro
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 39 – Am 43Contro
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 39 – Am 81Contro
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 50 – Am 106/1A favore