Bart GROOTHUIS

Bart GROOTHUIS

Partito: Volkspartij voor Vrijheid en Democratie (Netherlands)
Gruppo politico: Renew Europe Group

Statistiche di voto

1598
A favore
2480
Contro
51
Astenuto
0
Giustificato
349
Assente
Ha votato in 4478 / 5887 votazioni (76.1%)

Cronologia delle votazioni(4478)

DataVotazioneScelta
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 11/6A favore
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – recital N/2A favore
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 29 – Am 33Contro
2026-03-10A10-0045/2025 – Abir Al-Sahlani – Proposal for rejection – Am 164= 165= 166=Contro
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 22 – Am 28Contro
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 57/1A favore
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 25 – Am 75Contro
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 13 – Am 83Contro
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 29/2A favore
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 28A favore
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 17/2A favore
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 4 – Am 97Contro
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 11/2A favore
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After recital H – Am 90A favore
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 32A favore
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)A favore
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 26 – Am 76Contro
2026-03-10B10-0156/2026 – § 6A favore
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 16/6A favore
2026-03-09Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE GroupContro
2026-02-12RC-B10-0114/2026 – After § 8 – Am 14A favore
2026-02-12A10-0256/2025 – Johan Danielsson – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)Contro
2026-02-12RC-B10-0114/2026 – After § 8 – Am 9Contro
2026-02-12A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point k/1A favore
2026-02-12A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point w/2A favore
2026-02-12A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – After recital AG – Am 10Contro
2026-02-12A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point jA favore
2026-02-12A10-0256/2025 – Johan Danielsson – § 4/2Contro
2026-02-12A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, after point f – Am 5Contro
2026-02-12A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point q/2A favore
2026-02-12A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point aa/1A favore
2026-02-12A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – After § 55 – Am 5A favore
2026-02-12A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point q/1A favore
2026-02-12A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – Citation 6Contro
2026-02-12RC-B10-0120/2026 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)A favore
2026-02-12A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – § 16Contro
2026-02-12RC-B10-0112/2026 – § 13/4A favore
2026-02-12A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point ab/1A favore
2026-02-12RC-B10-0121/2026 – § 5/2A favore
2026-02-12RC-B10-0114/2026 – After § 10 – Am 4Contro
2026-02-12A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)Astenuto
2026-02-12RC-B10-0114/2026 – Recital N/1A favore
2026-02-12A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – § 17Contro
2026-02-12A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – After § 35 – Am 3A favore
2026-02-12RC-B10-0112/2026 – § 13/2A favore
2026-02-12A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – After § 63 – Am 9Contro
2026-02-12A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – § 22/2Contro
2026-02-12RC-B10-0114/2026 – Recital J – Am 7A favore
2026-02-12RC-B10-0110/2026 – § 10 – Am 2A favore
2026-02-12RC-B10-0121/2026 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)A favore