Kristoffer STORM

Kristoffer STORM

Partito: Danmarksdemokraterne (Denmark)
Gruppo politico: European Conservatives and Reformists Group

Statistiche di voto

2362
A favore
2242
Contro
487
Astenuto
0
Giustificato
158
Assente
Ha votato in 5249 / 5887 votazioni (89.2%)

Cronologia delle votazioni(5249)

DataVotazioneScelta
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 14 – Am 69Contro
2026-03-10A10-0011/2026 – Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová – After § 32 – Am 8A favore
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 55 – Am 54Contro
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 37/2Astenuto
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 20 – Am 74Contro
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – recital J/2Contro
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 41/5A favore
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – Recital R/3Contro
2026-03-10A10-0011/2026 – Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová – After § 10 – Am 10A favore
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 11/6A favore
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – recital N/2Contro
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 29 – Am 33Contro
2026-03-10A10-0045/2025 – Abir Al-Sahlani – Proposal for rejection – Am 164= 165= 166=A favore
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 22 – Am 28Contro
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 57/1Contro
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 25 – Am 75Contro
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 13 – Am 83Contro
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 29/2Contro
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 28Contro
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 17/2Contro
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 4 – Am 97A favore
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 11/2Contro
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After recital H – Am 90A favore
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 32Contro
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)Contro
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 26 – Am 76Contro
2026-03-10B10-0156/2026 – § 6Astenuto
2026-03-10A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 16/6Contro
2026-02-12RC-B10-0114/2026 – After § 8 – Am 14A favore
2026-02-12A10-0256/2025 – Johan Danielsson – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)Contro
2026-02-12RC-B10-0114/2026 – After § 8 – Am 9A favore
2026-02-12A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point u/3Astenuto
2026-02-12A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – Recital M/1Contro
2026-02-12A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point k/1Contro
2026-02-12A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point u/5Astenuto
2026-02-12RC-B10-0110/2026 – § 1 – Am 6A favore
2026-02-12A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – Recital M/4Astenuto
2026-02-12A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point w/2Contro
2026-02-12A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point r/2Astenuto
2026-02-12A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – After recital AG – Am 10Contro
2026-02-12A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point jContro
2026-02-12A10-0256/2025 – Johan Danielsson – § 4/2Contro
2026-02-12A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, after point f – Am 5A favore
2026-02-12A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point q/2Contro
2026-02-12A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point aa/1A favore
2026-02-12A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – After § 55 – Am 5Contro
2026-02-12A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point q/1Contro
2026-02-12A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point g/2Contro
2026-02-12A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – Citation 6Astenuto
2026-02-12A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point u/4Astenuto