Tobiasz BOCHEŃSKI

Tobiasz BOCHEŃSKI

Partito: Prawo i Sprawiedliwość (Poland)
Gruppo politico: European Conservatives and Reformists Group
Emailtobiasz.bochenski@europarl.europa.eu
Profilo ufficiale PE ↗

Statistiche di voto

2511
A favore
1885
Contro
413
Astenuto
46
Giustificato
21
Assente
Ha votato in 4876 / 5887 votazioni (82.8%)

Cronologia delle votazioni(4876)

DataVotazioneScelta
2026-03-26A10-0040/2026 – Birgit Sippel – Article 1 – § 1; Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 – Article 10 – Am 29A favore
2026-03-26A10-0040/2026 – Birgit Sippel – Article 1 – § 1; Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 – Article 10 – Am 33Contro
2026-03-26A10-0073/2026 – Arba Kokalari, Michael McNamara – Article 1 – § 1 – point 5; Regulation (EU) 2024/1689; after Article 4 – § 1 – Am 31Contro
2026-03-26A10-0069/2026 – Bernd Lange – After recital 4 – Am 58Astenuto
2026-03-26A10-0073/2026 – Arba Kokalari, Michael McNamara – Article 1 – § 1 – point 5; Regulation (EU) 2024/1689; after Article 4 – § 2 – Am 103Contro
2026-03-26A10-0069/2026 – Bernd Lange – After recital 1 – Am 49Contro
2026-03-26A10-0040/2026 – Birgit Sippel – Before Article 1; Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 – Article 3 – § 1 – point a – Am 35Contro
2026-03-26A10-0070/2026 – Bernd Lange – Motion for adjournment of voteContro
2026-03-26A10-0029/2026 – Borys Budka – Draft Council decisionA favore
2026-03-26A10-0069/2026 – Bernd Lange – Article 3 – § 1 – after sub§ 1 – Am 61Contro
2026-03-26A10-0069/2026 – Bernd Lange – Commission proposalA favore
2026-03-26A10-0073/2026 – Arba Kokalari, Michael McNamara – Article 1 – § 1 – after point 2; Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 – Article 2 – after § 10 – Am 91A favore
2026-03-26A10-0073/2026 – Arba Kokalari, Michael McNamara – Article 1 – § 1 – after point 2; Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 – after Article 2 – Am 92A favore
2026-03-26B10-0178/2026 – Motion for a resolutionA favore
2026-03-26A10-0026/2026 – Jérémy Decerle – Draft Council decisionA favore
2026-02-12RC-B10-0114/2026 – After § 8 – Am 14A favore
2026-02-12A10-0256/2025 – Johan Danielsson – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)Contro
2026-02-12RC-B10-0114/2026 – After § 8 – Am 9A favore
2026-02-12A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point u/3Contro
2026-02-12A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – Recital M/1Contro
2026-02-12A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point k/1Astenuto
2026-02-12A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point u/5Contro
2026-02-12RC-B10-0110/2026 – § 1 – Am 6A favore
2026-02-12A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – Recital M/4Contro
2026-02-12A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point w/2Astenuto
2026-02-12A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point r/2Contro
2026-02-12A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – After recital AG – Am 10Contro
2026-02-12A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point jA favore
2026-02-12A10-0256/2025 – Johan Danielsson – § 4/2Contro
2026-02-12A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, after point f – Am 5A favore
2026-02-12A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point q/2Contro
2026-02-12A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point aa/1A favore
2026-02-12A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – After § 55 – Am 5A favore
2026-02-12A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point q/1Contro
2026-02-12A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point g/2Contro
2026-02-12A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – Citation 6Contro
2026-02-12A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point u/4Contro
2026-02-12RC-B10-0120/2026 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)A favore
2026-02-12A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – § 16Contro
2026-02-12RC-B10-0112/2026 – § 13/4Contro
2026-02-12A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point ab/1A favore
2026-02-12RC-B10-0121/2026 – § 5/2Astenuto
2026-02-12RC-B10-0114/2026 – After § 10 – Am 4Contro
2026-02-12A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)Contro
2026-02-12RC-B10-0114/2026 – Recital N/1A favore
2026-02-12A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – § 17Astenuto
2026-02-12RC-B10-0114/2026 – § 8/1Contro
2026-02-12A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – After § 35 – Am 3Astenuto
2026-02-12RC-B10-0112/2026 – § 13/2Contro
2026-02-12A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – After § 63 – Am 9Contro